Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Harvey Milk Airport ?: Homosexual Orgy Of Power In San Francisco
But today brought forth a resolution by San Francisco Supervisor David Campos. He himself is a homosexual and oddly entered the United States illegally. I kid you not. But no one seems to mind.Least of who was then Mayor Gavin Newsom who appointed Campos to the Board of Supervisors . I guess Gavin thought David a little more unqualified than the Gav himself , so it would make Newsom look better. Campos wants to change the name of San Francisco International Airport to Harvey Milk International Airport. Milk was a homosexual from New York who at the time was a Supervisor in S.F. Milk was murdered while in office. He instantly became a cause celebre. Campos needs the support of five other Supervisors to get the Propostion on the ballot and then the voters will decide whether to change the airports name. .
Milk was queer. Airports should not be named after one issue queers.Homosexual should show caution. They may well be a one generation phenomenon. .Their capricious and arrogant and non hygenic sexual behavior may stop short any celebration of the renaming because their ranks may be withered by the various diseases they harbor. They may fail because of their success.
Friday, August 13, 2010
Prop 8 Backers Have No Authority?
United States District Judge Vaughn Walker who overturned same sex marriage prohibition Propostion 8 thinks backers of Prop 8 have "no legal authority"to appeal his ruling. He maintains that the backers are "not affected"by the marriage of same sex couples whereas the couples are being denied their "constitutional rights to marry...and they should be treated equally". Gee , where in the Constitution is there any mention of marriage? Where in the Constitution is there any mention of hygiene or corrupting the youth? Yet we have passed laws regarding hygiene and preventing the corruption of youth.
Judge Walker is effectively saying he overuled the voters because they had no right to vote. That ruling sounds like a anarchists scream. Where's equality now?
Thursday, August 05, 2010
Prop 8: Unconsitutional?
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Prop 8 :Homosexual Activists And Hate Crimes
According to recent newspaper reports, homosexuals activists across the country are planning protests and civil disobedience because of the passage of Prop. 8. They liken their political cause to the civil rights movement of the 1960s. I don't think so. Codified segregation of the blacks was illegal. Whereas same sex marriage prohibition follows cultural norms recorded in documented history. Otherwise, " What's next?"
Hate crime legislation wasn't around in the 1960s. Hate crime fines and punishment exponentials didn't show up till the 1980s. So these civil disobedience and verbal harrassments and all that will follow can lead to hate crime super punishments for the rowdy and hateful homosexuals.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Motion Picture "Milk" & Sean Penn
Mayor Newsom was there pressing the flesh. There was talk of maybe using a shirt sleeve to trick Newski into getting more than he bargained for. But best not to compromise Gav who is the"go to guy" when human evolution needs to be turned on its head.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Same Sex Marriage & Required Blood Tests
The young who are in favor are aged 18-29 with the older being 50+ voting no. A few weeks ago the Center For Disease Control released a survey of teenage girls across all races. It showed 1 in 4 girls had a STD (sexually transmitted disease). That's America's upcoming breeding stock who are right behind the 18-29 age group that voted 68% in favor of same sex marriage.
Normally people date many times before finally popping the question about marriage. Will this new attitude towards same sex marriage encourage bisexual dating before settling down to a homosexual or a heterosexual marriage? Speaking of popping the question. Will any of the ambivalent sexual adventurers pop the question to their new partner " Where you been honey and who with ?". Maybe they wouldn't want to bring up the subject because they may be infected themselves?
No one has the "right"to infect another with a STD. No one should expect others to pay for their spreading avoidable diseases. At some point -like now- mandatory blood tests for STDs including AIDS/HIV have to be passed before marriage licenses are issued.