CALIFORNIA AND PG&E WILDFIRES SOLUTION

The popular narrative in California's wildfire holocaust is that Pacific Gas And Electric should be vilified for profiting from electricity sales and distribution while at the same time it creates sparks from its equipment that creates an inferno. At the same time in this progressive infested state is that California already has more "social policy victims" per square inch than all the causalities from all the wars that have been fought at any time and at any place.Some Californians would be less upset if PG&E would disappear and a government bureaucracy would take its place and make no profits. One could count on no profits and probably more expenses in a state run business where no one is fired or criticized. That fall back position is a kind of schadenfreude substitute that mans id defaults to on these no-win situations.But would that solve the problem? Could government do a better job? Please think a bit longer before jumping into the fire from the frying pan.Here's my rhetorical question. Should electricity be in the wilderness? Shouldn't electricity be confined to urban treeless areas where only humans can receive the upside and the downside of its transformative powers?

Ocasio-Cortez : Not Worth Feeding

New congresswoman from New York Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is touting her Green New Deal.In her description of its benefits are "social justice for the poor" through care for the planet and the jobs that will be required to that end. Sounds like a win-win for the moron herd that follows her. But my take on her "care" for the environment is a Trojan Horse for socialism.The problem with the environment is mans degradation of it.So if we really want to reverse environmental damage there should be less people. Redistributing wealth from the wealthy to the poor will only make it worse. People with money are the problem. Whether they be rich or poor. A zero sum planet feels every ouch of nibbling humans.Most humans should not have been born. Consequently the ones here are really not worth feeding when measured against the requirements of the planet to be healthy .The bonus would be a redistribution of wealth, a "social justice" of sorts when the planet gets it's fair share of water, space and air.Also the wealthy will lose much of their wealth because of a lack of markets to sell to and own shares of.

Was Andrew Stern of SEIU Threatened ?

"Socialistic Fanatic Union Boss Resigns After Major Victory" could be an incredulous headline. But in fact Andrew Stern of the Service Employees International Union resigned today. He was recently appointed to a prestigious Presidential commission by Barack Obama on ways to cut the deficit. This was a partial payback for all the work that the SEIU did in helping BO get elected. Also his union has been the equivalent of street thugs-Hitler had "Brown Shirts"- for the democratic party in squelching dissent at "town hall" meetings no matter who ran the meeting.  That "i" in the SEIU stands for international and probably meant he would take his union around the world as per the communists of the 1920s. Yet he resigned. 

Could he be fearful for his security and health? Has he been threatened?

Preacher Obama Is Tiresome

I'm not a church-going man. I don't disapprove of churches or church- going people. To each his own. But I do disapprove of Preacher Obama. He and his loyalists are constantly wagging their fingers at me and others about how "we" owe ever increasing amounts of care to others. He and his followers have an attitude of religious rightousness about them that is nauseating. This is paricularly bothersome when he directs expensive aid to people who don't take themselves seriously . Why should I care about someone when that someone doesn't care about him or herself? That person may choose to be overweight, choose to have a sexually transmitted disease, choose to game the system of entitlements, etc. Let them reap their harvest.

There is money in mega churches. But there's more money and power in mega government. That's why Obama choose the biggest bully pulpit.

Shut up Preacher Obama .

China's Communists Government vs. China's Bourgeoisie

At the same time the U.S. -capitalism-is fighting creeping socialism, China - communism-is fighting creeping legions of the bourgeoisie. Where will the outcome leave both countries and their governments? One has to refer to the laws of physics to get a peak at the future of these two diametrically opposed philosophies. Physics dictates that only the low cost producer will survive. In this application , only the elements of both societies will remain after both governments collapse because of their own nonrelavance.

And the winner will be the individual with skills.

"Too Big To Fail ": Not True

When a politician says ," It's too big to fail", what he means is ," My part in the scheme of central planning has turned up another losing result that if allowed to fail will cost me and my fellow politicians our jobs. ". Like the communists, socialists and aristocracies of ancient history the U.S. has become a costly central planning nightmare.

" It's too big to fail" also means we are too lazy or too dumb to change. " Too big too fail" also means that money is the ultimate goal. And so today the Federal Reserve announced an additional $800 billion bailout and government guarentees . This is targeted to backing credit cards, student loans and toxic mortgage purchases. And how will the government pay for all this? The printing press will be smoking.

It's not that easy. The outcome will be a falling dollar and at some point hyperinflation will come around. The foreign buyers of our debt are already looking elsewhere.

Progressives In San Francisco?

What's a progressive by San Francisco standards? The new president of S.F.'s Board of Education is called a progressive. He is Mark Sanchez. Mr. Sanchez is a homaosexual, latino, socialist mix who favors more African-American remedial help. He also favors a proactive homosexual orientation for any children that are toying with the ideas of an alternative lifestyle. This is progressive? It's more like a virulent distillation of failed mutant parts of the Civil Rights Acts that we all have suffered through these past 40 plus years.

What does S.F. need to do to be called truly progressive? How about not dragging down the general school population to the level and advancement of chronic laggards in the classrooms, no matter what race. Those underacheivers should be segregated among their peers. Also homosexual orientation and counseling is more appropiately administered by health care workers. They can better inform and guide juvenile minds about the serious health issues associated with that life choice.

Now that would be progressive.