Obama, Congress, Syria, Tomahawk Missile, Sarin Gas, Nobel Peace Prize

President Obama is our black president and also the recipient of a Nobel Peace Prize. He is the walking talking incarnation of how far affirmative action has rendered heretofore revered positions and prizes sullied by political correctness. But "it is an ill wind that doesn't carry some good". Obama's deferring to congressional approval for a retaliatory missile on Syria does deserve a clap of the hands. Granted he took his cue from Britain but I doubt if George W Bush who is a kind of affirmative action moron who only because he's the  scion of the Bush Family  political cartel would have exampled such heed..

It looks like Sarin gas was used.. Was it Assad? Was it the rebels? We don't know for sure. Sarin gas kills no more brutally than shrapnel , vaporization, bleeding to death or by infection or amputation etc.Adult minds don't parse the difference. Only adults with children brains see a difference.The weapon of choice for the retaliatory strike would be a sea-launched Tomahawk Missile. But they are supposed to be surgical. They are supposed to be pinpoint. They are touted as only killing the "enemy". Sounds like god's justice. here are a few details about Tomahawk Missiles.They are 18 feet 3 inches long. They weigh 3500 pounds. They carry a warhead of 1000 pounds. They cost between $569,000 and $1.45 million depending on how accurate you want them. " I shot an arrow into the air..." Can anyone in the world honestly say that an 18 foot, 4500 pound missile that travels at close to sonic speeds can hit its target without impacting a considerable amount of contiguous space? That's also known as collateral damage. I would take bets that for the 1425 people who died from Sarin gas our Tomahawk strikes would impact or kill at least more than double that amount.

Mr. Peace Prize Obama was half correct in deferring to congress. He would have been 100% correct if he said no to any retaliatory strikes on his own because of humanitarian reasons.

Power Brings Out The Best And The Worst In People

In 1964 Martin Luther King Jr. won the Nobel Peace Prize for his powerful, successful,  non-violent leading of the civil rights movement in America. In 2009 Barack Obama, who is the first Africa-American president, won the Nobel Peace Prize whilst expanding the Afghanistan war.

King, a minority, non-violent leader, set up the opportunity for Obama, a minority to become president. And what did the first minority president do? He took the unprecedented power and became like the majority of greedy presidents who project increasing arrogance. King would disapprove.

Jimmy Carter Is No Match For Zionists

Poor Jimmy Carter. He thought that Zionists were like most other humans. You know, like having the spirit of compromise, some charity, some compassion or some of anything that is not obsessive greed that leads to sedition. Zionists have been treated like persona non grata for all of recorded history. But Carter thought he saw something good in them. What a fool our former president and Nobel Peace Prize winner was. He brokered the 1978 Camp David Accords between Egypt and Israel. Since then the U.S. has paid billions per year to both countries not to fight each other. Israel used that crack in the cupboard to gnaw billions more out of gullible and naive Americans. And what is worse Israel's lobby got the U.S. to try to remake the Mideast power and demographic map in Israel's favor. The Iraq War is but one and the latest example.

Carter is in the Middle East visiting regional leaders in an effort to fulfill his draem of a peaceful region. He also has plans to meet with the leader of the U.S./Israel branded "terrorist" organization Hamas. Carter believes that it is self-evident peace can only be achieved if all the players are at the table. But in a classic Zionist " what have you done for us lately" gesture, Israel has refused security assistance to U.S. secret service body guards. Also top Israel leadership has refused to meet with him because of the Hamas meeting.

Carter made a key mistake in the writing of the Camp David Accords. From 1967 to the 1978 signing of the Accords, Israel was illegally occupying Palestinian lands in the West Bank. Israel was carrying out a slow-motion genocide of the indiginous Palestinians. Carter should have demanded an Israeli pullout of those lands or no Camp David payday. But that's history. And we all have 20/20 vision in retrospect.

But when one is dealing with Zionists, one need only refer to history and see what other countries were up against and how they handled the problem.