TRUMP IMPEACHMENT TRIAL , ISRAEL, AND SAUDI ARABIA

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said today she is sending Articles Of Impeachment to The Senate next week. What will Iran choose to be the best strategy to put Trump into real jeopardy of losing his job? What bait would Iran use to set a trap ? Should Iran or it's proxies launch an attack on American forces or it's "allies" before or after the trial in the Senate ? I would think the trap should commence before the trial begins. Proxies of Iran should be used.The target or targets should not be American forces. The targets should be Saudi Arabia and Israel. Neither country is vital to the United States. And more importantly both countries are loathed by the rest of the planet. Then Trump would be damned if he did launch an attack on Iran for the safety of non vital interests and could be legitimately be labeled irresponsible leadership .And if he didn't swallow the bait and didn't react to save the Zionists or the Saudis then the Neocons and the larger military-industrial would suffer a major blow and could shift American mideast policy to more disengagement.

TIME FOR MUTINY: UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES ?

Neocons always want another war in Mideast. That's not news. But today a Japanese tanker was suspiciously attacked by unknown actors in the Straits Of Hormuz. It was timed for the arrival of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe who was in Tehran seeking to diffuse the dangerous situation between the U.S. and Iran that was started by our withdrawal from the international agreement with Iran. That is news. Within ten or fifteen minutes Secretary Of State Pompeo blamed Iran. That's stretch given the circumstances of a diplomatic peace meeting between Iran and signatory to international peace treaty Japan. Also the owner of the Japanese tanker said the ship was not set afire by mines but received gun fire from an unknown source. That doesn't fit the Trump administrations narrative as spoken by Pompeo who claimed Iranian mines were the cause of the damage to the tanker. Why rush to war? What about our troops? Our troops are also citizens. No commander has the authority to be reckless with their well being . If a commander is reckless then the troops have a justifiable recourse to protect themselves. In this case if we dive into another deadly and costly war against historically traceable Iran ( Persia )on behalf of reckless Neocon foreign policy or money-making business for the military-industrial complex or for the protection of Standard Oil of California 1933 recreation Saudi Arabia or United Nations 1947 creation of Israel it's not worth it. Soldiers have a duty and a right to mutiny on their own behalf. Visit any Veterans Administration Hospital and see the ones that lived.The therapy for mind and missing parts for vets tell the tale of criminal commanders and lobbyists who want war.Many vets are buried.

Romney Is Another Bush: Calls For Another " [ Project For The New ] American Century":

Today Mitt Romney wrote an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal. it was titled " A New Course for the Middle East". Well that's not what he described. He starts out in the first paragraph by ticking off the various calamities that America is faced with in that region. Romney never notes that most are self inflicted calamities. How about invading Iraq? He mentions our loss of prestige and our loss of life. He doesn't mention the cost in money. Maybe he thinks spending by the military-industrial complex is good for business. He also mentions Israel. He is seemingly devastated by the way Obama has demoted Israel's security in favor of the region as a whole. He then goes on to mention Israel a total of EIGHT times. He mentions Israel's Prime Minster Netanyahu. He mentions Iran once. he mentions Egypt once.

He doesn't mention how he is going to shape U.S. foreign policy in the mid east to the new realities in the region. Instead he would as president basically double-down on past neocon policies with a new roll out  of the Project For The New American Century. And I quote, " Our challenges are different now, but if the 21st century is to be another American Century, we need leaders who understand that keeping the peace requires American strength in all its dimensions."

We don't need another jingoistic shopkeeper in the White house. Harry Truman and George W. Bush were two too many. The former gave us Israel and the latter continued to defend the mistake.

Remember Project for New American Century? PNAC for Short

Whatever happened to the Project for the New American Century? It was formed in 1999 shortly after then president Bill Clinton ordered a war of choice against Serbia. He authorized 37,000 bombing missions! Why? He said it was to stop Serbian "ethnic cleansing"of Muslims. But it probably had more to do with getting his name off the front page with super blow-job operative Monica Lewinski. Anyway the farting and belching American electorate/couch-potatoes were more interested in sub sandwiches, beers and an occasional joint while watching sports or Seinfeld. In short they didn't care or did not notice.

But social bacteria like Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Bill Kristol and fellow Zionist- strain pathogen Paul Wolfowitz along with other members of the American Enterprise Institute central casting of NEOCONS had an idea. If Clinton's barbarism in Yugoslavia didn't bother the slobs of America then why not form PNAC and take barbarism on the road? All they would need was "provocation" real or imagined. Well then came 9/11 and the rest is history. But on the way to world domination PNAC and hapless America ran into Afghanistan. The Iron Age country seems to be killing U.S. troops at will lately.

The take away lesson is money and arrogance can never beat an occupied peoples will to survive and prevail.

George W. Bush and the End of Neoconservatism

George W. Bush by his actions has effectively ended neoconservatism as a viable strategy. The useful moron to the neoconservatives has proven to be the instrument of the rejection of neoconservatism in the Middle East. Turning the little idiot loose with the military to invade Afghanistan and Iraq has brought swift reactions. One by one ,Iran, Egypt, Lebanon, Yemen, Turkey, Tunisia, Algeria, Afghanistan , Iraq, Palestinians and others have distanced themselves from U.S. and the neoconservatives. The people in the streets have revolted against their Western bribed leaders to advance more representative government. Probably many will come up with an Islamic Republic as per Iran. Which brings up a question. Who will we sell arms to? Will we sell/give arms to Egypt with the Islamic Brotherhood represented in government? Which brings up another question. Will our military-industrial warmongers want to sell to Islamic Republics? What will the Israel lobby tell state governors about denying sales to Egypt which will impact jobs in their locales? Next to go will be Israel. It will either bend to a two state solution or disappear.

I wonder What W. thinks? Maybe he says to himself, " What me worry?"

P.S. Today, February 7, the Associated Press is carrying the story George W. Bush scheduled speech in Switzerland before the United Israel Appeal was canceled. A number of protest groups including Amnesty International have filed for W.'s arrest and arranged for "shoe throwing demonstrations" for his alledged war crimes. The reineactmentment of shoe throwing episode is in rememberance of a brave Iraqi journalist who's only way of protesting the crude cretins presence at an Iraqi news conference some years ago was to toss his shoes.

W. must have a hint how pathetic he is when only parasitic Zionists are your supporters.

General David Petraeus, Fox Neocon News & Secrets Of Surge " Success"

Fox's Neocon chautauqua-news staged an implied Victory In Iraq award ceremony on Sunday.The host asked Gen. David Petraeus if he planned to seek the presidency after his recent pacification of Iraq.

The General said, " No". And why should the General be proud of this type of "military victory"? After all the secret of the success of the " surge" was simply to pay Sunnis $10.00 per day to fight al-qaeda or stay at home. That's $3.00 per day more than they were on average earning during the Saddam era. Also the other secret of the success of the surge was the Iranian savior faire to reign in Shiite militias so Bush could have a smelly fig leaf to hide behind in exchange for an implied no U.S. bombing of Iran position.

The pity of it all was the Iraq War was a war of choice and only made things worse for American prestige and security in the future.