What Was Started By The Jews And Taken Over By The Mafia?

What was started by Jews and taken over by the Mafia? The answer is the Catholic Church. Read about it in my latest book. It's title is " Jesus Was Tall And Well Spoken: A Different Account of Christ and His Catholic Church". All roads lead to Rome.

Jew Spring In Israel?

Well look'ye here, trouble in Zionist Paradise! The smiles couldn't last. All that plenty which includes stolen Palestinian lands, nuclear bombs, money and more arms for free from the United States, laws against discrimination around the world, people of different cultures actually marrying Jews and vacationing in occupied territories etc.

But alas a bump in the road. Protestors set up tents in Tel Aviv. Protestors came out on the main streets. Pickets gathered around the homes of high profile plutocrats of dairy products. The reason was the high price of cottage cheese. The price brought on a national boycott of the food in Israel. No it wasn't the slow-motion genocide of the Palestinians that motivated rebellion in the Zionist ranks. It wasn't the approximate 60 years of constant war .It was the price of cottage cheese. Doesn't that speak volumes about that race.

Well whatever it takes to start a Jew rebelious spring in Israel, I'm for. We should arm bothsides. Tanks for the people who want to attack the protestors in the tents. And RPGs (rocket propelled granades) for the tenters who want to defend against tanks. For clean up details, crematoria hardware should be provided to obviate burial on stolen precious lands.

John Galliano & A Brief History of Antisemitism

Christian Dior designer John Galliano was fired for making anti-semitic remarks to a Jewish couple in Paris a few nights ago. What did the Jewish couple say that brought Galliano to proclaim"..I love Hitler ......Jews should be gassed."? Maybe they were laughing over dead Palestinians or praising the Israelis for the slow-motion genocide of the Palestinians. Would that conversation have gotten the jewish couple fired at their respective places of employment if that were picked up by the press?

A brief history of anti-semitism would include the basic fact: There had to be a Semite first.

Immigration, Discrimination & Race-Based Caucus In Congress

A key element of the new immigration law that is being debated is putting policy back into immigration. This means that new applicants will be judged primarily on their skills that fit with U.S. needs and also their education. This is a dramatic shift from " family-based " immigration. This allowed immigration based simply of a family connection to a U.S. citizen.

I think this still leaves the jury out on whether America's experiment with multiculturism will work or endure. At last look, there are over 123 members of Congress that are members of race-based caucuses. They include 43 members of the Jewish Caucus, 43 members of the Black Caucus and 37 members of the Hispanic Caucus. Thst's roughly 1/4 of the Congress that has declared itself due for special treatment.

The Jewish Caucus stands out in it's outsized representation of a race. Their number include 13% or 13 Senators in that body. This compares with their meager 2% of U.S. population. One can see how America's dangerous and extravagant support of Israel springs from these Israel-first Senators and the support of the race-based lobby American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

The Black Caucus is pushing for a formal U.S. apology and reparations for slavery. Yet Africans want to come to America freely in greater numbers than the slave era of the 17th century. They are lucky they are here.The Hispanic Caucus pushes for amnesty and relaxed immigration standards for the largely 12 million illegal Hispanics now in this country. Is this the way to honor the prized American citizenship?

All these caucuses practice race-based discrimination. They don't want to fit in. And why should they? Special interests politics in America have done very well by making a point of purposely not fitting in. These caucuses deserve to be treated with the same animosity that they hold towards the rest of America.

Jimmy Carter: Gets No Respect From The New York Times

Today The New York Times' Best Seller list omitted Jimmy Carter's new book, " Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid". Amazon listed the book at #5; Barnes & Noble carried it #10; and the San Francisco Chronicle's Bay Area Best Seller List ( largest market in U.S.) listed the book at #2. What's up at the N.Y.T. ?

Maybe Jimmy stepped over the line. He had the courage to criticize the Israeli policy of constructive genocide against the Palestinians in his latest book. But he knows of what he speaks . He was the president who coaxed, some say bribed, Egypt to sign a peace treaty with Israel in the early '80s. Both countries still receive billions from America to be publically polite to each other. But what has Jimmy done for the Israeli zealots lately? So maybe The New York Times is refusing to acknowledge Carter's best selling book because of spite.

If this is true, then the paper should be more accurately titled The Jew York Times.