The Word "gay" Has Been Abused.

California's Governor Jerry Brown has signed legislation today to "add lessons about gays and lesbians to social studies classes in public schools". According to the news venders, the bill requires public schools to include the contributions of people who are gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender in social studies curriculum. Most everyone knows that Oscar Wilde was a homosexual. Writer Gore Vidal is a homosexual. Thier works and countless others of the homosexual persuasion are on reading lists in schools. So what's different about this legislation? I suspect these additional studies are works that instruct or encourage young children about the joys of queer sex. If it isn't this then why bother? Good reading speaks for itself. Whether its from a homosexual or a heterosexual. Shouldn't children go to school for basic teachings?What's been set aside to squeeze in sexual tail sniffing?

So this is a backdoor (pun intended ) literal foreplay or soft porn manual to guide children on sexual exploration. The homosexual lobbies are recruiting youngsters and Jerry and Californias Assembly are leading the children by the hand to these predators. Will the teachers mention HIV or AIDS as the fallout from homosexual behavior?

I "googled" the word "gay". I wanted an original dictionary definition. There were 1.8 billion references. But the references were mostly about meeting other homosexuals-chat rooms, counseling, political action groups, porn shops etc. Obviously there is one predominant thing on their collective minds. Poor "gay", the word no doubt started out as way to describe a wholesome feeling of joy . But now it's asscociated with disease and predation of the young.

Rare Consensus On African Americans

Yesterday Jack O' Connell , California Superintendant Of Public Instruction declared, "The education of African-American students has reached a crisis stage. Scores of that group remained well below [for years] those of White, Asian-American and Latino."

Mr. O'Connell makes it unanimous. He is joined by white supremacists, bigots and black demagogues and everyone in between. They all agree on this sorry fact. It's actually a rare example of consensus in America. But the reasons for that fact differs widely when one asks a supremacist or one asks a black demagogue. The former blames genetics while the latter blames everthing else but genetics.

But the opinions of the reasons are really beside the point. The question should be what do we do about the fact. Facts can't be ignored. Or better put, facts can be ignored but only at great risk. I think that people who can't learn or wont learn should lose privileges. In this case students who chronically fall behind and stay there should be expelled from school . Serious and capable students should not be distracted by students who just take up space or worse in the classroom. The expelled students can then seek work or break the law. That's their choice. But at least the classroom will be safe from their negative pollution.