CALIFORNIA AND PG&E WILDFIRES SOLUTION

The popular narrative in California's wildfire holocaust is that Pacific Gas And Electric should be vilified for profiting from electricity sales and distribution while at the same time it creates sparks from its equipment that creates an inferno. At the same time in this progressive infested state is that California already has more "social policy victims" per square inch than all the causalities from all the wars that have been fought at any time and at any place.Some Californians would be less upset if PG&E would disappear and a government bureaucracy would take its place and make no profits. One could count on no profits and probably more expenses in a state run business where no one is fired or criticized. That fall back position is a kind of schadenfreude substitute that mans id defaults to on these no-win situations.But would that solve the problem? Could government do a better job? Please think a bit longer before jumping into the fire from the frying pan.Here's my rhetorical question. Should electricity be in the wilderness? Shouldn't electricity be confined to urban treeless areas where only humans can receive the upside and the downside of its transformative powers?