Protestors Against Trump Always Have Space

Protestors against President Donald Trump's executive order that tightens immigration for some Muslim countries always have enough space to demonstrate. Imagine the space that would be necessary if all the supporters of Trump's new policy on immigration showed up in force but couldn't go because they had to work at their regular jobs?

Dont Blame Trump: Times Make The Man

Times make the man. Trump is the creation of 50 plus years of the Civil Rights Act Of 1964.Progressives and the roving attorneys who are paid by various agencies in addition to contingency awards enforced the codification of inclusion and affirmative action. The Act by extension killed freedom of association and any product of thought from personal critical thinking. Critical thinking was killed because of political correctness.So Trump won. He will now try to kill his parents humanely by rolling back extraordinary implications of the Act. The prime example is the ushering in of the trannies. The progressives including the tongue twisting LGBTQ brigade value the trannie as their greatest victory.Trump is a German. His comparison to Hitler by some is noted and over done. But this sauerkraut unlike Hitler will use his bully pulpit to stop odd balls from dictating policy.

Super Wealthy And Poorest

The charity Oxfam published a jarring statistic two days ago. The top eight wealthiest people have assets equal to 3.6 billion of the worlds poorest. So the bottom half according to Oxfam has approximately $430 billion in assets compared to a similar asset tote of the most wealthy.The progressives and other acronyms who are in the wealth distribution business immediately rubbed their collective hands in shock and an equal amount of glee. After all it's a fact that could equate into a massive amount of "charity"with other peoples money.Hold on Oxfam.So what's to be done? Do you really want to take a significant amount of $430 billion and put into the hands of the worlds poorest? Those 3.6 billion people are poor largely because they shouldn't have been born in the first place. I know. It's sounds harsh. But do you really want the 3.6 billion to have more children and put more pressure on the environment?Here's a thought. Maybe the eight wealthiest buy the reproductive rights of the poorest 3.6 billion. That way the poor will enjoy a windfall And the planet will have some extra years.